I’ve been shy about picking a candidate to support for President. Until Edwards dropped out I had hoped for a brokered convention that could bring serious change, an opportunity for the people to have input to the Democratic party’s platform, a chance that we could break through the walls of deceit and propaganda to some clarity regarding holding corporations accountable, an opportunity to tax corporations to begin the reparation of the damage they’ve done to our environment, to our institutions, to the world. I had hoped for an opportunity to have voice in the decision to end war and reassert the value of diplomacy in our international relations. I had hoped for a reasonable approach to the provision of human services, an approach that drove the engine of private enterprise fueled by profit and greed away from this most public sector of our culture and economy. I still think we can force a change. And I’ll still be happy to vote for either Clinton or Obama in the fall. And I think we can make a difference by letting our voices be heard. Yes we can.
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
Stu Savory 02.04.08 at 12:16
The nearest to MY political views was Mike Gravel.
But he seems to be too far out for the average american
Also, I fear if Obama becomes presnit, it will only be a few short months before some mad racist assassinates him
Frank Paynter 02.04.08 at 3:03
Two things…
1) Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich didn’t seem that far apart in my view. I could have supported either as the Democratic candidate. Both confronted the issues of private enterprise and public service better than the big three, now two.
2) Don’t come astroturfing that “madman” rationalization for violence here. If there is another violent or nominally accidental death of a liberal in power, then look for who benefits. Don’t chalk it up to a lone nut with a gun.
madame l. 02.04.08 at 7:06
nice higher resolution version here. directed by jesse dylan BTW. not made under the direction of any pr or ad firm. yes we can.
the assassination argument is one i hear / read about often and is an “argument” or “sentiment” that i think may say more about the questioner than the reality. it is So Beside The Point. so “24″. “i would, but i’m worried for “them”…” cue “brown paper packages tied up in string”…
we guts to stop this kind of thinking, people. it’s So embedded.
jeneane 02.04.08 at 10:02
kinda like working at the plant at 22 and getting ready to get married and showing a picture in the ladies room and hearing laverne say, “I really don’t agree with marrying outside your race - i mean not because i’m racist or anything, but i don’t think it’s fair for the children.”
what–because of people like YOU?
fuck that shit.
same people say - they’ll be a riot if he gets the nomination and loses.
Yeah, well, shit happens.
War? That’s a planned enterprise.
Frank Paynter 02.04.08 at 10:23
Irritability… the doc asked me today if I was experiencing irritability. “Always,” sez I. So I want to pick on another facet of Stu’s observation about Mike Gravel. To wit: I don’t think we know enough to say what the “average American” thinks of Mike Gravel. He has always been marginalized by the military/industrial complex, by the supply-siders, by the hawks, by the dick-weeds in the media who can’t hold a full set of left wing alternatives in front of the people. I think it is easier for an informed English speaker in Europe to understand the range of alternatives than for Americans whose news bandwidth is narrowed to network TV.