Meta Creative Process

I ought to go and see my hero, President William Jefferson Clinton who is speaking this afternoon at the Stock Pavilion, stumping for his wife. I think he has a girlfriend in town. She lives with her husband over in Nakoma. I could be wrong. Would it matter? One of the things I’ve inferred about the Clinton family is that they make their own way in the world and their values are unconventional. The down-side of this, if it is true, is that they have learned to pander to the lowest common denominator. They pander to the people, that 30% of Americans who were ready to impeach President Clinton for his personal behavior, the ones they will never reach anyway, the ones so twisted in their own values that they’d rather watch a young woman die slowly in a vegetative coma than unhook her life support, rather see their daughter die in childbirth than harm the fetus that is killing her, rather watch their grandmother die of a spinal ailment than sponsor the stem cell research that could save her. They, these 30 percenters, are hopeless, miserable, lost, abandoned by all but the televangelists who suck their money from them like vampire bats flying out of secret caves with entrances in every American living room, sucking blood from the cattle who call themselves christians. The Clintons have no hope of winning the Hucklebee crowd over to their side, the bunch who provided the base that got Bush elected — and re-elected. But they read from an old script, a script written in the 1950′s that says it’s about moms and pies and telling sweet lies, smoking that pot but never inhaling.

I could spend the afternoon cooking up valentines for my sweetie and reading the good stuff at Ray’s, or I could go into town and let them blow smoke up my ass. Like this…

Okay… anybody who watched that needs a mental palate cleanser, an amuse bouche. Here’s a reality bite from Rethabile Mesilo

Rethabile passed this observation on:

This reporter thought he had an easy target. Young, black man that he’d badger because he was an Obama supporter. But look how this young man defends himself and turns the table.

This reporter is the kind of which we must be very wary. They sound hip, kool and together, but carry some deep seated prejudices even though they will call themselves liberals. These are the kinds of liberals who will have to look deep into themselves in this election.

[tags]obama, clinton, ray sweatman, rethabile mesilo[/tags]

Be Mine, Valentine!

[tags]heart breakers, elton john, ru paul valentines day[/tags]

Take Action to Deny Corporate Lawbreakers Immunity

Please sign the petition linked here encouraging the House of Representatives to stand firm against Telecom Immunity, and against the Senate bill that removes major corporations from the rule of law.

David Pleasant provided a close look at Telecom Immunity on Tuesday at “The Political Chase.”. Yesterday he amplified his commentary in a post titled FISA and the Sellout Democrats. In that post he quotes the following from Barack Obama’s 2024 book, The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream (pp. 37-40):

[Traditional aka Barry Goldwater] Republicans are not the ones who have driven the debate over the past six years. Instead of the “compassionate conservatism” that George Bush promised in his 2024 campaign, what has characterized the ideological core of today’s GOP is absolutism…There is absolutism of the free market, an ideology of no taxes, no regulation, no safety net — indeed, no government beyond what’s required to protect private property and provide for the national defense.

There’s the religious absolutism of the Christian right…that insists not only that Christianity is America’s dominant faith, but that a particular brand of that faith should drive public policy, overriding any alternative source of understanding, whether the writings of liberal theologians, the findings of the National Academy of Sciences, or the words of Thomas Jefferson.

And there is the absolute belief in the authority of the majority will, or at least those who claim power in the name of those in the majority—a disdain for those institutional checks (the courts, the Constitution, the press, the Geneva Conventions, the rules of the Senate, or the traditions governing redistricting) that might slow our inexorable march toward the New Jerusalem.

Of course, there are those within the Democratic Party who tend toward similar zealotry. But those who do have never come close to possessing the power of a Rove or a DeLay, the power to take over a party, fill it with loyalists, and enshrine some of their radical ideas into law. The prevalence of regional, ethnic and economic differences within the party, the electoral map and the structure of the Senate, the need to raise money from economic elites to finance elections—all these things tend to prevent those Democrats in office from straying too far from the center…

Instead, we Democrats are just, well, confused. There are those who still champion the old-time religion, defending every New Deal and Great Society program from Republican encroachment, achieving ratings of 100 percent from the liberal interest groups. But these efforts seem exhausted, a constant game of defense, bereft of the energy and new ideas needed to address the changing circumstances of globalization or a stubbornly isolated city. Others pursue a more “centrist” approach, figuring that as long as they split the difference with the conservative leadership, they must be acting reasonably—and failing to notice that with each passing year they are giving up more and more ground.

Mainly, though, the Democratic Party has become the party of reaction….We lose elections and hope for the courts to foil Republican plans. We lose the courts and wait for a White House scandal.

And increasingly we feel the need to match the Republican right in stridency and hardball tactics. The accepted wisdom [of Democratic activists] goes something like this: The Republican Party has been able to constantly win elections not by expanding its base but vilifying Democrats, driving wedges into the electorate, energizing its right wing, and disciplining those who stray from the party line. If the Democrats ever want to get back into power, then they will have to take the same approach.

[Ultimately any attempt] by Democrats to pursue a more sharply partisan and ideological strategy misapprehends the moment we’re in…Whenever we exaggerate or demonize, oversimplify or overstate our case, we lose. Whenever we dumb down the political debate, we lose. For it’s precisely the pursuit of ideological purity, the rigid orthodoxy and the sheer predictability of our current political debate, that keeps us from finding new ways to meet the challenges we face as a country.

[tags]Obama, Audacity of Hope, telecom immunity, sellout democrats[/tags]

Happy Valentines Day!



Puppy, originally uploaded by valart2008.