From the Wikipedia:Â While de Man’s work in the 1960s is normally distinguished from his deconstructive work in the 1970s, there is considerable continuity.
There’s a broken-nose, mouth-breather thing going on here. It could have sump’n to do with the modifiahs, the advoibs and the adjectives, y’know?
{ Comments on this entry are closed }
Got a message from Dave Winer to the OPML mailing list to the effect that the “
