Here’s a link to a right wing rationale for the internment of blacks in America. The author, John McAdams, says (the bolding is my own):
But when Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle set up a Commission on supposed “racial disparity†in the Wisconsin criminal justice system, he not only asserted that the disparity is real (which it is) but that it is undesirable. Indeed, his commission is called “The Commission on Reducing Racial Disparities in the Wisconsin Justice System.†It’s true he directed the Commission to “[d]etermine whether discrimination is built into the criminal justice system at each stage of the criminal justice continuum of arrest through parole.†But then he told it to [r]ecommend strategies and solutions to reduce the racial disparity in the Wisconsin criminal justice system. . . .â€
It might seem, on first glance, that “racial disparityâ€â€”and here the issue is that blacks are jailed and imprisoned at a much higher rate than whites—is a bad thing.
But what if the disparity is the result of the fact that blacks commit more crimes than whites? Looking back at the Governor’s charge to the Commission, if it’s not established that the disparities are the result of discrimination, how do we know we want to eliminate them? And what if incarceration in fact serves highly desirable goals of deterring crime and incapacitating the criminals? If so, the Commission is on a fool’s errand, instructed to recommend things that will make the quality of life in Wisconsin worse. And particularly worse for black people.
Probably McAdams didn’t have the data that white adults commit more drug crimes than black adults, but far fewer whites end up in jail for these crimes than blacks.
That disgusting application of narrow logic and high school debate technique to real problems is part of the reason it’s so difficult to make progress in these matters.