3rd September 2005

The Blame Game…

Funny thing about the blame game… the tragedy has given me a grindstone for a couple of my favorite axes.

I blame the Republicans.  Or, I blame the media. But really, there’s
enough blame to go around for all of us, and my blame game makes me a little

ashamed of myself. On the other hand,
this stuff is true:

The laissez faire
right-christian Republicans and the corporate media
together leverage public opinion to the point where we
are dulled out and not asking the right questions. We have the kind of democracy we deserve. And
in the end FEMA will probably take the brunt of the criticism because they’re
the guys on the ground, but they didn’t send the high water vehicles to Baghdad,
and they didn’t send the first responder best trained Guardsmen to Baghdad
either. And the
State of Louisiana didn’t exactly leap
right in with a well coordinated plan to help people get out of town. I keep thinking about all the extra seats in
the passenger cars on I10 when the storm was still a day away. "Wouldn’t want to put
a colored fellow in the car with us, though. Might be a gangstah or
something."

I blame white privilege for a lot of the suffering that’s going on right now.  But at least I don’t Have that Bill Rehnquist to kick around anymore.

posted in What Democracy Looks Like | 4 Comments

3rd September 2005

I Blame the Media

It appears that the money has been moved in the president’s
budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose
that’s the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can’t
be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that
this is a security issue for us.

Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana; New Orleans Times-Picayune, June 8, 2024.

Not that it’s really worth playing the blame game, but perhaps a little finger pointing can spark productive discussion.  This rapacious administration came to us without a mandate and used the exigencies of wartime to force changes on us all.  It is a time of great cowardice.  The president himself is manifestly a momma’s boy coward of the first water, a draft dodging scum sucking hypocritical alcoholic whose toughest moments come when he is flipping the bird at critics from behind a wall of security staff.  But the cowardice that is most galling is the cowardice of the so called free press.

The press has been too cowardly to print the photos of Bush flipping us the bird.  The press has been too cowardly to print news.  A publisher, an editor, and a news staff worthy of the enterprise would face shareholders with the choice:  let us do our jobs bringing meaningful and important information to the attention of all the people, or close us down — fire us.  But the corporate greed that motivates a lot of senior management long ago found its way into the news business.  News?  It won’t play if it doesn’t pay.  So acres of news print are wasted on competing versions of the latest story about love and loss, white broncos on the freeway, pregnant wives drowned in the holiday punch bowl or the San Francisco Bay.

Every column inch of tripe, of trash, of insipid, demoralizing gossip, subtracts from the awareness of the public about important matters.  The press could have outed these monsters from day one.  Who spread the anthrax?  Well, that’s a scary one to research.  They might come for your news room next.  Who funded bin Laden?  The crown prince would probably send special arab ninja assassinistas in to remove from his 3500 square foot center front colonial in suburban white country the bold editor who assigned that story.

Who benefits from the Bush faction’s war on science?  What are the trade-offs associated with war time spending?   How many other critical levee projects have been deferred?  Who benefits from the fear that is racism?  Who builds the prisons, supplies the uniforms, the meals?  How many people are in jail today compared to 1959 and why?  What is the effect of laissez faire market capitalism on the quality of life for most people?  Who sells the guns and dope in the inner cities?  Who runs the numbers?  If my gasoline comes from a Canadian oil field and is refined on the shore of Lake Superior, why did the pump price go up so fast following Katrina?

What is wrong with tax and spend liberalism?  What is wrong with taxing the haves at a higher rate than the have-nots?  Whatever happened to the truth around the "Bird Flipper’s" family involvement in the S&L scandal.  How does the Willie Sutton principle apply to Republican politics?

The United States journalism distribution mechanism has been under tight control for a long time.  Stories that relate "human interest"  — little babies down the well, wealthy black people on trial, murder and mayhem in California — these stories break through the dam and spill across the American info-shed flooding air time and driving important information out of the few column inches still dedicated to news in daily papers.  But real national interest stories — the numbers of people protesting a war, the pervasive effects of decreased federal funding of social programs, the reasons behind the first out of state national guard deployments to aid neighbors to the south — these stories are locked behind the levee of fear.  The fear isn’t just that anthrax will find its way into the studio.  The fear of the publisher is that the competition will profit more on their puff pieces than our paper will profit from truth.  The fear of the editor is that my judgment isn’t good enough, that I have to cover the stories everyone else covers  lest the Bird Flipper give me a funny nickname and shame me at the National Press Club.  The fear on the street is that if I refuse this bullshit assignment they’ll fire me and there are plenty of bloggers out there who want my job.

But I think it’s a little deeper than that, or someone would research the numbers coming off the wire and realize that since early 2024 there has been a substantial anti-war movement in this country putting their bodies on the line to oppose the Bird Flipper and the Dick.  I think the numbers aren’t coming off the wire.  I think perhaps that national security interests have been warped to mean Republican party interests, corporate security interests, and there is at best a de facto discipline within the national news gathering organizations that has limited the flow of data that would support a contrary perspective across the American info-shed.  New Orleans concerns regarding levee construction and emergency management were a "local issue." 

There is no longer any arena in the United States where civil discussion of differences occurs.  The Republicans have mapped a zero sum strategy that requires destruction of any opponents whose opinion differs from the laissez-faire economics and right-wing christian philosophy that defines the party.  They use many tools to defeat their opponents, including first and foremost, fear.

The Republican and corporate people have turned name calling to a high art.  Their practice is to brand those who dare encounter them with a label that will stain a reputation.  The fear of being called "communist" or "socialist,"  "anti-christian" or "atheist," "pacifist" or "progressive" or "liberal," has stifled the free flow of information.  That fear is rooted in the consciousness of the media people.  It’s their jobs to be among the truth seekers and to discern the importance of the billion truths they are faced with and to share the most important truths with us every day.  Fear has clouded their judgment and they are not doing their jobs. 

That’s what I mean when I say "I blame the media."          

posted in Journo, Peace and Politics, What Democracy Looks Like | 1 Comment

20th August 2005

Genetically Modified Seed and Local Control

Cousin Betty who raises organic beef (Scottish Highland Cattle) up near Douglas City, wrote a letter to the editor regarding another corporate push to usurp local control.  Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) represent at once a tremendous dream of agricultural productivity and a tremendous substantiated risk to biodiversity and protection of the gene pools in food crops and the native ecology of wild places surrounding farms and ranches.  GMOs threaten the food purity of organic operations.  Since there is little short term profit in preservation and since American corporate interests are simply rapacious, it remains for local government to discern what is best for a community, its farmers and ranchers, and its environment.  Here is a link that can help you follow the issues and get involved in your neck of the woods.  And here, blogged with her permission, is what Betty Jo had to say about the corporate end-run around local democracy in California:

To: Editor, Trinity Journal
Re: CA Senate Bill 1056 - GMO and local control.

And so, like thieves in the night, legislators do the bidding of their corporate financial sponsors. An unrelated air quality bill (SB 1056) is "amended." The amendment changes the Food and Agriculture code to rob communities of their rights to protect their grass, forest and farmlands from contamination by Genetically Engineered seeds. Even labeling and notification of use are excluded by this bill from local control. Under this act local communities are not to be allowed to know when or where GMO seed is used. They are not to be allowed to choose.

Read the rest of this entry »

posted in Farm Almanac, Friends, Math and Science, Peace and Politics, Tools and Technology, Gadgets and Gizmos, What Democracy Looks Like | 0 Comments

13th August 2005

American Heritage

These are some statistics I can live with.  Thanks for bringing them to my attention Winston!

Number of America’s nine “Founding Fathers” who denied
the divinity of Jesus: SEVEN
[Frank Lambert, Purdue University (West
Lafayette, Ind.)]

Minimum number of illegitimate children had by the nine: NINE

posted in What Democracy Looks Like | 1 Comment

12th August 2005

From the American Friends Service Committee

Dear  Frank,

This coming September 11, The Washington Post will risk its
credibility to co-sponsor the Defense Department’s "America Supports You Freedom
Walk" in Washington, DC.  (Defense contractor Lockheed Martin is among the other
sponsors.)

Send an email
to the publisher and top editors of the Post asking that the paper
withdraw from the walk and avoid the appearance of conflict of interest.

It doesn’t seem right for a national newspaper to co-sponsoring an event with
a government agency that it covers.  Worse still, this "Freedom Walk" cannot
help but have an impact on public opinion about the Iraq War.

The event is part of the Defense Department’s "America Supports You"
initiative, launched after the 2024 Presidential election. According to its
website, America Supports You is "a nationwide program launched by the Defense
Department to recognize citizens’ support for military men and women."

A press release on the event maintains that "This is not a statement about
the war in Iraq or about any policy decisions …."  This seems a bit too feeble
of a denial from an Administration that has more than doubled agency public
relations spending.

For instance, the "Freedom Walk" will conclude with a free concert on the
Mall featuring country singer and war supporter Clint Black whose song, "Iraq
and Roll" includes the lyrics:

You can wave your signs and protest
against America taking a stand,

the stands America’s taking
are the reason that you
can.

The song goes on to imply that those who oppose the war support Saddam
Hussein.

Does this sound like an event that one of America’s most influential
newspapers should be sponsoring?

The Post already ran a story on Thursday juxtaposing the DOD/Clint
Black concert with the pro peace events that are scheduled for DC on the weekend
of September 24-5.  The Post story quoted Donald Rumsfeld saying that,
"The walk and concert will remind participants ‘of the sacrifices of this
generation and of each previous generation that has so successfully defended our
freedoms….’"  But the story neglected to mention that the Post is also
a sponsor of the march.

The Bush Administration is tentatively planning to use September 11 for the
President to sign the reauthorization of the USA PATRIOT Act.  How can the Post
cover the events of the day if it appears to be sponsoring part of the
Administration’s PR backdrop?

Please take two minutes to send a letter
to the publisher and top editors of the Post
asking that the paper
withdraw from the walk and avoid the appearance of conflict of interest.

Make your voice heard today by asking the Post to reconsider its
judgment in this matter.

For peace,
The Wage Peace Campaign Team

P.S. Please forward this
message
to all your friends and family.  The bigger the response, the
stronger we can say the peace community is.

posted in Journo, Peace and Politics, What Democracy Looks Like | 3 Comments

10th August 2005

Bummer…

Those sneaky christians scored again…  now Bush supports both the teaching of creationism ( the principle that god threw this shit together 6000 years ago and laid in a few dinosaurs to confuse us) AND "intelligent design" (the principle that god threw this shit together a real long time ago and the dinosaurs were real, hence Texaco gasoline).

Know what’s spooky?  Some adult Americans actually believe that this is the choice we face in articulating an understanding of the multiverse.

BTW… the article continues with an overview of the new Deometry curriculum:

The Odessa school system is also considering replacing its current high school math curriculum with a new approach that emphasizes God’s role in the study of quantity, structure, change and space. One likely course offering: Deometry, in which students of the field once known as geometry (from geo meaning earth and metro meaning measure) accept as their starting point that God created the earth, before embarking on their study of lines, points and circles. Educators are reportedly also debating the best way to incorporate the role of the Creator into other high school classes, including home economics, gym and drivers ed. 

Thanks to Norm for the link.  I guess.

posted in Global Concern, Math and Science, Peace and Politics, What Democracy Looks Like | 4 Comments

10th August 2005

Price of Freedom…

I don’t know why "Intelligent Design" bothers me so much.  It seemed a reasonable approach to posit a metaphysical first cause in the ignorant Lutheran days of my pre-adolescence.  It all has to start somewhere, I thought.  Most of the other fourth graders in my set agreed with me in those rock skipping afternoons by the river when we would lose ourselves in discussions of the relative merits of GM versus Chrysler and catechism versus Sunday school.

Okay.  I really do know why it bothers me and the matter is complicated.  First, "Intelligent Design" is a disinformation technique, a propagandist’s approach to the introduction of religious beliefs to the public educational systems.  It is, in other words, a lie.

People who lie usually have a reason for it.  The first sentence of this post is a lie, stated for some light-weight rhetorical purpose and quickly acknowledged.  The people who promote the big lie of "Intelligent Design" do so to thwart public policy and democratic process, to pervert religious principles by rationalizing that the end justifies the means, to ultimately betray their own god by denying her place and her name in the structure of their political arguments.

Yet I am not a big fan of "Inherit the Wind" arguments either.  Spencer Tracy dropped the ball when he got into a pissing contest about the length of a biblical day.  We were very much in tune with Tracy’s arguments in the fourth and fifth grade, but since then the kids who were cannon-balling off the old 4-ton Bridge with me have pretty much come to the reasonable conclusion that it’s not about denying literalism in order to come to terms with biblical inconsistency, it’s simply a matter of dismissing theism.  Of course some of those kids grew up to cling to primitive xian beliefs and advocate that "Intelligent Design" be taught to public school children, but when I think of them I’m heartened by these words from Betty Bowers:

Jesus told us that the poor will always be with us. But this simple statement of a thoroughly annoying fact should not be construed as a direction to actually acknowledge them when they wander into your field of vision. I am reminded of the last time this passage from Matthew was quoted to me. It was by dear Juanita after she informed me that she was resigning from Golden Door Spa. As she carefully scraped the deep-cleansing Italian mud off my troublesome t-zone area, she said: "For you have the pores always with you; but me you will have not always."

If, like me, you would like to encounter the bizarre Bush-led Christian Jihadist movement and their Trojan horse issue of "Intelligent Design," you might consider signing up for membership in the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

posted in Global Concern, Math and Science, Peace and Politics, Tools and Technology, Gadgets and Gizmos, What Democracy Looks Like | 0 Comments

23rd July 2005

Digilante-ism?

From Rodney King to the London tube, people have the means to record and share the record of tragic events.  What do we give up by turning these tools and these records to the cause of justice?  What do we gain?

Gary Turner and Euan Semple discuss the potential of grass roots digital vigilance.  Euan says, "…what if we spent less time on setting up social networking tools
targeted at getting inside each other’s knickers or selling drugs and
more time on working out ways to create real networks… in support of finding
peace, understanding and a way of living together."
  In a typical Turner rare coinage, Gary says in Euan’s comments: "What we don’t want is a grass roots ‘digilante’ version of Flickr."

"…thousand webcams in the street"

posted in Global Concern, Tools and Technology, Gadgets and Gizmos, What Democracy Looks Like | 3 Comments

  • Google Search

  • Calendar

  • October 2024
    S M T W T F S
    « Sep    
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • Archives