Resolution

Madison prelate Bob Morlino (or “Pasta Bob” as we like to call him) picked up the Congress of Racial Equality’s Lifetime Achievement Award “for resisting groups seeking to deprive him of his fundamental right – as an American and as a Catholic leader – to express support for a state constitutional amendment to protect marriage as a man and a woman.” The award is just a symbol of Morlino’s resolution to serve the oligarchy of his faith at their intersection with the secular oligarchy of wealth and power. By “otherizing” gays Morlino drives a wedge between decent people in two oppressed groups. This makes him just another one of Karl Rove’s flying monkeys, and I say this not as a member of a “group seeking to deprive him” of anything, but rather as an individual who is sick to death of fat priests feeding off the people. Regardless of black and white denial, gay-lesbian-bisexual-and-transgendered people have also gotten the shitty end of the stick from the predominantly white power elite. Disapproval of non-heterosexual love knows no racial boundary, and encouraging homophobia is a wedge issue that continues to rend the fabric of the progressive movement. Morlino knows this.

There was a time not long ago when the Catholic church did better serving the poor, the needy, the oppressed. But today liberation theology is dead. Just as Dietrich Bonhoefer died in the 1940′s in order that weak willed cowards and closet fascists could survive, so Oscar Romero died in our time. Ratzinger survived. Bonhoefer died. Morlino lives. Romero is dead. Morlino serves Ratzinger and Rove. He sits on the board of visitors of the School of the Americas, the US School for Assassins that trained the murderers of Oscar Romero.

There is no irony in play here, rather cold calculation and manipulation. This is a demonstration of the shepherds pulling the wool over the eyes of the sheep.

dada shampoo…

Kat Herding posts today regarding email marketing tips and techniques. It’s an artificial intelligence thingie.

“The dadaist is a man of reality who loves wine, women and advertising.”
Richard Huelsenbeck

The myth of multitasking…

For me, multitasking is a myth. My brother can do it. Back in the day, the TV blaring, Doctor John on the turntable, clouds of smoke and waves of conversation filling the room, he could tell you what had just happened on the tube even as he continued the phone call with Chet, cracked on the Taconic Parkway and trying to make a bail set too high due to the embarrassing load he was hauling.

I can get behind Linda Stone’s concept of continuous partial attention (CPA) as long as it’s not mistaken for multitasking. Multitasking is getting it all done in the time it would take to get some of it done. Multitasking would be being able to talk on the phone and work on the computer with neither of the activities suffering due to filtered attention. The highest level of multitasking the average human can reach, is munching snack foods while watching TV.

CPA is time slicing, and expertly performed it might get you through the day at a higher level of productivity than a single minded devotion to the two tasks of slouching on the couch while watching Donny and Marie, pondering what awful incestuous secrets they may be concealing, and slamming the chips and dip located at arms reach. Finishing the snacks and the TV show at the same time is more a matter of logistics than productivity improvement, but it is certainly multitasking. Taking it up a notch, adding a few chores, homework, monitoring twitter, blog posting, reading the latest Robert Parker novel, and walking the dog — each of these may require its own time slice and be impossible of simultaneous accomplishment with any other.

And so, during a busy day we learn to divide our attention, refocus quickly, and work for brief periods on what is in front of us while coming back to tasks we have set aside in favor of others.