Posts tagged as:

journalism criticism

IMAGE DELETED DUE TO READER SNARLS AND COMPLAINTS

Alcott puts the squeeze on Mancuso


Twickenham’s Chemmy Alcott (above, with her bosom buddy silver medalist Julia Mancuso) finished just twelve places out of first in the women’s downhill skiing competition in Whistler yesterday. That tidbit along with some riveting information on the curling competition typifies the London Times sports coverage of Vancouver 2010. Otherwise their coverage has been a solid round of whinging and snotty critique with a few headline stories squeezed in.

Owen Slot, the Times head sports reporter, had this to say about Shaun White:

“…neither fear nor physical frailty, nor indeed self-awareness nor the remotest glimmer of self-deprecation seem to interrupt the rise of his fame or the expansion of his personal empire.

The Double McRecovery [Mr. Slot's obscure name for White's amazing "Double McTwist 1260"] served only to crank up his rise to the top of the chat-show establishment.”

Dry humour.

The London Times called the bobsled run “the death track,” and styled Vancouver 2010 as “the calamity games.” To underscore the nature of the calamity, Slot cites the case of the Zamboni breakdown. It seems that the ice surfacing machine had some mechanical difficulties, since repaired. It’s ironic that London, perhaps the most cosmopolitan city in the English speaking world, is served by ill-informed and provincial sports hacks such as Slot. Planning and presenting a gathering as complex as the Olympics is a huge challenge. The Brits, more familiar with Goldie Lookin Chain than with Gold Medals, will have their challenge in 2012. One can only hope that the world’s press treats London 2012 better than the London Times has treated Vancouver 2010.

Post to Twitter  Post to Plurk  Post to Yahoo Buzz  Post to Delicious  Post to Digg  Post to Facebook  Post to MySpace  Post to Ping.fm  Post to Reddit  Post to StumbleUpon

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Web versioning

November 15, 2009

Ethan Zuckerman refers to Dan Gillmor’s slow news advocacy here, and he extends the concept to journalism criticism, the stories about stories that critics write. His post traces the update history of a recent story about a story that dominated the news cycle for a few days last week. He says, “What I’d love to be able to do is compare the current version of [the] story with the one that originally ran.” He suggests the Wikipedia edit history model as a tool that would help us understand the origins and subsequent iterations of fast breaking stories. Sounds good to me. One of my biggest gripes about web info is the lack of temporal referents. Even Amazon is stingy with the copyright and publication dates of the books it sells.

I’d find it handy if web narratives contained both publication dates and a history of editorial changes. How can we make that happen?

Post to Twitter  Post to Plurk  Post to Yahoo Buzz  Post to Delicious  Post to Digg  Post to Facebook  Post to MySpace  Post to Ping.fm  Post to Reddit  Post to StumbleUpon

{ Comments on this entry are closed }