NEA Peace & Justice Caucus

  • el
  • pt
  • by Frank Paynter on July 19, 2024

    For the first time in memory, the National Education Association (NEA) has taken an anti-war position, according to Rhonda Hanson, Chairperson of NEA Peace and Justice Caucus.  At the NEA convention attended by 9000 delegates in Los Angeles last week, the Caucus introduced and won passage of the following motion:

    New Business Item 61

    The NEA calls on President Bush and Congress to:

    • Support our troops by creating an exit strategy to end the U.S. military occupation of Iraq and bring our troops home.            
    • Provide adequate veterans benefits and meet the needs of our veterans for adequate jobs, education, and health care. 

    The NEA will:       

    • Support NEA members and their families called upon to serve in Iraq by identifying and providing information about resources and services to help meet their special needs, by advocating for their interests, and by protecting their jobs, seniority, and benefits.                
    • Advocate the reordering of national priorities toward peace and the human needs of our people.

    Rhonda’s message continues,

    Last year we could not get an anti–war motion on the floor. It died on a move not to consider.  This year, the delegation defeated a move not to consider and attempts to amend the language in order to gut it.  Clearly the delegates were ready to discuss and vote on the issue.  This represents a sea change in NEA and is clearly reflective of the erosion of support for the war, especially significant because NEA represents suburban and small town America.  It is also significant because it reflects a change in the culture of NEA.  In recent years there has been pressure, especially from the states, not to consider anything which is not "directly related to education."  Of course, we always make the connections between the war budget and funding for education (Our t-shirts and bumper stickers say "A war budget leaves every child behind.")  We also made every effort to disassociate the policy and policy-makers from support for the troops.  I think this was also critical in winning support for the motion.  While the language may not be as strong as we would like (exit strategy vs. out now), it does represent the first time in memory NEA has taken an anti-war position.

    { 0 comments… add one now }

    Leave a Comment

    You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>