The source essay from the Electronic Village that Prometheus 6 analyzes may have some factual errors, and it may perpetuate some myths.
Not “may”, Frank. DOES have factual errors. DOES perpetuate some myths.
Why is that acceptable? How can you plan based on error? Therefore
in general don’t they outline a solid programmatic response to a real problem?
No. It is based on wrong ideas about Black folk (and I can’t call them errors because they have been perpetuated…exactly these ideas have been perpetuated…since the Civil War, leading to “all these problems for all this time.”
What issue is important to you, personally important, survival important, that you are willing to accept false information on which to build your plans?
I’m asking you to rethink this as though it were YOUR problem, or at least the problem of an ally.
]]>