Would that there were some way-cool, universal merit-filter bobbing in the ether that would beam nullifying white noise at your mouth, or instantly disconnect your keyboard whenever you were about to communicate something stoopid.
But thar ain’t.
So, at least in the blogverse anyway, first to market is wot counts. The Early-Bird Card is the thing Dave Winer and others will wave whenever they need a credibility fix. It works often enough. Wottayagonnado.
Blogs aren’t usually a lot more than a public shrine to one’s own ego, anyway. You’re posting for yourself, first. Doesn’t matter if they’re listening or not. Just say what you want to say. Then say it again. And once more with feeling.
Add your voice to the cacophony/chorus. It will (eventually) be heard.
]]>It�s back to the grind today but I�m OK with that. It was a good week of vacation. And the 5:45am entries are back. Seems there was a bit of a revolt about that whilst I was gone. Update: Here’s…
]]>It�s back to the grind today but I�m OK with that. It was a good week of vacation. And the 5:45am entries are back. Seems there was a bit of a revolt about that whilst I was gone. Once again,…
]]>It�s back to the grind today but I�m OK with that. It was a good week of vacation. And the 5:45am entries are back. Seems there was a bit of a revolt about that whilst I was gone. Once again,…
]]>“Is it wrong to point out the errors of tedious and tendentious “bloggers?” Is it wrong to do this in a way that draws negative attention to their faults? Is it mean and cruel, unfriendly, to adopt a style that strongly affirms a point of view and value judgments regarding the work of others?”
No, it isn’t wrong, as long as you don’t make it personal. The recent brouhaha here — darn, blogspot isn’t opening for me, it’s Apt 11D, link embeddeed
Who are the bloggers in your neighborhood
http://www.crookedtimber.org/archives/002122.html
embody what happens when one blogger makes a personal accusation, and anotehr doesn’t shrug it off.
I think you did an elegant job of pointing out Winer’s intellectual error.
]]>