Comments on: Simple Changes, Number One http://listics.com/200811184542 We're beginning to notice some improvement. Thu, 11 Feb 2024 05:48:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.7 By: Eunoia http://listics.com/200811184542/comment-page-1#comment-60288 Sun, 23 Nov 2024 18:23:01 +0000 http://listics.com/?p=4542#comment-60288 Haven’t had homeland security since 1492!
[paraphrasing Geronimo] 😉

]]>
By: Betty Jo http://listics.com/200811184542/comment-page-1#comment-60198 Wed, 19 Nov 2024 18:44:41 +0000 http://listics.com/?p=4542#comment-60198 Hi Frank,

When I hear the term “Homeland” I think of the song “America the Beautiful”. I like that term, and see no reason to allow the fascist’s misinterpretation to deny our use of it.

In my opinion, It’s not the term “Homeland” that’s the problem, it’s the Bushian definition of “Security”.

To me, Homeland Security means a strong Public Health Service, support for local first responders (from Volunteer Fire Depts to Community Policing), strong environmental protection laws, food security through support of local healthy food production and small farms, a strong public education system that encourages kids to advance their education by giving them the ability to pay for college without going into crushing debt.

It is a encouragement of a national ethic that focuses on helping one’s neighbors, not (as old Ashcroft envisioned it), spying on them. It’s an immigration policy that actually processes applications for legal immigration (rather than simply piling up or losing the paperwork year after year after year). And, yes, it’s a tax policy that asks the question “how much compensation is enough?” and then answers that 7 homes and multiple private helicopters and private jets is probably excessive and ought be better put to rebuilding infrastructure and investment in education and health to the benefit of all.

]]>
By: Frank Paynter http://listics.com/200811184542/comment-page-1#comment-60194 Wed, 19 Nov 2024 15:24:45 +0000 http://listics.com/?p=4542#comment-60194 I’m with you on that one Amber. Whenever I hear “war on [whatever]” I know there’s an advertising campaign afoot, an attempt to dumb down complex issues into an easily digestible polarization. “Two sides to every story….” You’re either for us or against us….” How absurd and reductive these things are, but after a while they saturate our consciousness and we are in danger of taking shortcuts when we think about complex problems.

Here’s a good blog, On Day One, where the matter was highlighted some time ago.

]]>
By: Amber in Albuquerque http://listics.com/200811184542/comment-page-1#comment-60193 Wed, 19 Nov 2024 14:52:05 +0000 http://listics.com/?p=4542#comment-60193 I don’t have a new name, and you may be going to cover this in a future post, but I’d love to see an end to the “war on” terminology that is making our country resemble those in Orwell’s 1984. War on terror, war on drugs, even war on poverty…no, let’s work to end the wars (as best we can); let’s work to solve problems, not fight them; I’d just like to live in a country where ‘peace lover’ isn’t hate speech.

]]>