Comments on: Hugh Hewitt Fires Back! http://listics.com/200501212462 Frank Paynter's Voice and Vision... Tue, 23 Oct 2024 06:21:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3 By: fp http://listics.com/200501212462#comment-48040 fp Fri, 21 Jan 2024 19:57:51 +0000 http://listics.com/200501212462#comment-48040 That seems to be the blog-world conventional wisdom for sure. I've seen no one contradict it. But my BS detector says there is another side to the argument. Absent a request for (or an assurance of) both confidentiality and off-the-record-ness, why shouldn't I be allowed to share the ideas and material that comes out of a correspondence thread that I initiated, particularly one as innocuous as the Hewitt/Cone exchange? I ask that particularly in the context of guarding the correspondent's privacy. Common sense tells me there's no harm done. That seems to be the blog-world conventional wisdom for sure. I’ve seen no one contradict it. But my BS detector says there is another side to the argument. Absent a request for (or an assurance of) both confidentiality and off-the-record-ness, why shouldn’t I be allowed to share the ideas and material that comes out of a correspondence thread that I initiated, particularly one as innocuous as the Hewitt/Cone exchange? I ask that particularly in the context of guarding the correspondent’s privacy. Common sense tells me there’s no harm done.

]]> By: Shelley http://listics.com/200501212462#comment-48039 Shelley Fri, 21 Jan 2024 19:20:32 +0000 http://listics.com/200501212462#comment-48039 hewitt was right -- it was inappropriate of Cone to publish material from a private communication, assigning it to 'anonymous' or not. Odd behavior for a man attending a conference on 'ethics'. hewitt was right — it was inappropriate of Cone to publish material from a private communication, assigning it to ‘anonymous’ or not.

Odd behavior for a man attending a conference on ‘ethics’.

]]>